|
Post by Crow'sia on Jul 30, 2007 17:32:30 GMT -5
If you've visited my first poll (you should have) you'll know that if you intend to vote 'other' I would prefer if you actually gave a suggestion, or otherwise select 'no vote' etc.
Alright, so currently loopholes in NSE rules (I believe) allow one character to own as many lands as that one character pleases, to allow for certain plots and takeovers. Kind of a purposeful loophole. You cannot have one player play both leads of the same land, but nothing says that one player can't have two characters owning two different lands. So, should this be allowed?
I have no intention to change the rule saying one character can essentially take over everything, let's not focus on that. XD
I'm not sure if I've made this clear, so if you're confused, ask.
|
|
Denali
Full Member
Our lives are not judged by what we are doing or by what we have already done But by what we can do.
Posts: 177
|
Post by Denali on Aug 18, 2007 21:29:14 GMT -5
Typically, no I don't think that one player should ba able to claim more than one land - different chars or not. I have played the lead stallion of the mountains at one point, and I know that just the mountains kept me VERY busy. I couldn't imagine having to keep up with not only one but two lands. However, if there is a plot going on, such as a war between harems and stallions and what have you, yes, I think that there should be an exception to the rule - however, I do believe that it should be approved by the admin, so that people understand what's going on and such. um.yeah.uhh.....I lost my thoughts...I hope that's enough to be clear. >.<
|
|
|
Post by Crow'sia on Aug 18, 2007 22:14:00 GMT -5
Makes some sense. The current modified rule says only as a partner really; plots could be another. Although, I think I might force people to step down if they become inactive, cause, poor herds. XD
|
|